2018 | 2181 | CEAS | College of Engineering Survey
 2181-1 (2018)
University of Cincinnati  
University of Cincinnati  

  Responsible Faculty:  Donglu Shi   Responses / Expected:   11 / 20 (55%) 
format image
ABET sample a thru k
General

20MTEN3012 - 001--- Survey Comparisons ---
ResponsesCourse20MTENAll
SDDNOASANMeanGrp
Med
Med.ModeLowHighStd
Dev
NMeanGrp
Med
Pct
Rnk
NMeanGrp
Med
Pct
Rnk
Q1... apply my knowledge of math, science, and/or engineering00047114.64.75545.48844.34.44.5K4.24.4
Q2... design and conduct experiments01532113.53.43325.89833.53.54.5K3.73.9
Q3... analyze and interpret data00065114.54.44445.50834.14.24.5K4.14.2
Q4... design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints01415113.94.045251.08843.73.84.5K4.14.3
Q5... work as a team member02702113.23.03325.94843.73.74.5K4.04.3
Q6... identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems00128114.64.85535.64844.24.24.5K4.24.3
Q7... understand professional and ethical responsibility01334113.94.045251843.73.64.5K3.84.0
Q8... communicate (orally) effectively01343113.83.94425.94843.63.64.5K3.84.0
Q9... communicate (written) effectively01145114.24.44525.94843.94.04.5K4.04.2
Q10... understand the impact of engineering solutions in a broad context00128114.64.85535.64834.24.34.5K4.14.2
Q11... use techniques, skills or modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice00146114.54.65535.66834.14.24.5K4.24.4
Responses: [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 [D] Disagree=2 [NO] No Opinion/Neutral=3 [A] Agree=4 [SA] Strongly Agree=5 
Pct Rnk: Percentile Rank (100 is best, calculated vs. precise Mean)
ABET General Questions
General

Donglu Shi--- Survey Comparisons ---
ResponsesIndividual20MTENAll
SDDNOASANMeanGrp
Med
Med.ModeLowHighStd
Dev
NMeanGrp
Med
Pct
Rnk
NMeanGrp
Med
Pct
Rnk
Q12The course was well planned.00056114.54.65545.50844.14.24.6K4.14.3
Q13The professor was approachable to discuss problems related to the course.00119114.74.95535.62844.24.44.6K4.34.6
Q14Class assignments and exams were relevant to the course material.000110114.95.05545.29844.24.44.6K4.34.5
Q15The grading was fair.000110114.95.05545.29824.34.44.6K4.24.4
Responses: [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 [D] Disagree=2 [NO] No Opinion/Neutral=3 [A] Agree=4 [SA] Strongly Agree=5 
Pct Rnk: Percentile Rank (100 is best, calculated vs. precise Mean)
ABET General Questions
General

Donglu Shi--- Survey Comparisons ---
ResponsesIndividual20MTENAll
VPPAVGENMeanGrp
Med
Med.ModeLowHighStd
Dev
NMeanGrp
Med
Pct
Rnk
NMeanGrp
Med
Pct
Rnk
Q16Overall, how do you rate this course?00128114.64.85535.64844.04.04.6K4.04.1
Q17Overall, how do you rate this professor?00038114.74.85545.45844.14.24.6K4.14.4
Responses: [VP] Very Poor=1 [P] Poor=2 [A] Average=3 [VG] Very Good=4 [E] Excellent=5 
Pct Rnk: Percentile Rank (100 is best, calculated vs. precise Mean)
 
Q18 - Please enter any comments about the professor in the box below:
Faculty:Donglu Shi
Response Rate:45.45%   (5 of 11)
1n/a
2It was a great materials course, I enjoyed coming to class. Dr. Shi is very knowledgeable on the subject and is good at communicating difficult concepts in simple terms that are easy to understand.
3I think a lot of time in this course was spent on general materials concepts such as stress-strain curves, miller indices, and calculations for general material properties. I think these are fundamental and should definitely be covered, however I feel this also took away from the metallurgical concepts which were introduced later on. More time needs to be spent on metallurgy. Also I think better visuals such as videos and pictures should be used to reinforce these concepts.
4I really enjoyed coming to class and the lectures.
5Great Prof.